The convenience of modern technology vs life
In today's world, we use our mobile phones? to make & accept calls, to make appointments, to send messages, to "keep the wheels turning." So there is relevance most industries. - even emails are now sent & received, and materials / shopping is done, and of course, social media is a large part of most lives today. And of course, we are "encouraged" to use electric-powered vehicles, despite the catastrophic fires we've seen with car-transporting ships in recent years. Smoke - atmosphere?
While "green energy" offers undeniable convenience and safety, I beleve that we must also consider the unspoken costs, a more holistic view of every situation, instead of simply accepting mind control, which includes understanding the impact of modern life on our world. Let's explore the journey of these ubiquitous devices.
Just try considering the real costs of having all that convenience in your pocket.
The journey of a mobile phone? begins far from our hands, often in distant lands where vital materials like cobalt are mined. This extraction frequently comes at a tragic human cost, including the suffering of children forced into dangerous labour. This exploitation stands in stark contrast to the ethical principles we are told to uphold in preservation works.
Environmental scars of production
So what was a tanker carrying 330 litres of sulphuric acid doing on Epsteins island?
Maybe, now have another think about that 👍👍
Another "inconvenient truth" which is being forced upon us, to ensure "net zero," although we haven't asked for net zero, and indeed we have been lied to about, is "net zero" because, of course, we must all get electric vehicles.
First of all, I'm not a tree hugger, however I do appreciate and respect nature. My entire 'daytime' career has focused deeply on the use of traditional, in fact I could design carbon neutral, sustainable homes a lot faster than the £130, 000,000,000 salary that Ed Milliband is on target to currently "waste" by 2030 on his 'sustainable and 'carbon-neutral' materials.
Greta is not the halo-polishing angel that media portrays her to be... that said, in fact, I feel for Greta because I believe she's been used as another funded stooge who will be dropped like a hot stone once she's served her purpose, and that's certainly happening. I feel that she has been abused, to be honest... anyway, I am however a huge advocate of looking after our planet, and beleieve others should also. Sadly the governments of this world are extremely "selective" with the truths, and they actively hide the true facts.
As an easily relatable example: we all have our mobile phones?, which are battery powered, and we all are told, indeed being forced, to move to owning battery-powered vehicles... yet if you were to know of the immense damage caused to the environment from the mining of cobalt to create those batteries, you might think maybe, just maybe, our governments aren't actually very nice.
The biggest cobalt mines are in the D.R. Congo, Africa, where people; adults and children alike, are paid an absolute pittance (approx £2 per day) to crawl down into the unsupported and unprotected underground mines to extract cobalt. They are not provided with any ropes, harnesses, or PPE of any kind, they have to dig with their bare hands, they don't even have a flashlight!
However, with the cobalt comes sulphur, sulphur which is breathed into moist lungs (air/moisture) creating an acid that kills those poor people due to burning their lungs out. There is no NHS; in fact, they have no health support whatsoever! Once they get their loot back up to ground, it then is washed in the surrounding rivers to clean the sulphur off as they only get paid their pittance for the cobalt itself by weight, so the sulphur must be washed off before the cobalt is weighed. It is then transported in hundreds of heavily polluting diesel-spewing lorries which last had a service... never!
As time has progressed, the once fertile farmlands surrounding the mines and the rivers have become infertile, because sulphuric acid is simply a mix of water and sulphur, and dont forget that sulphuric acid is powerful enough to dissolve fully set concrete, so the people who are now working in the mines, and burning more calories than before meaning their breathing is increased, their body temperatures are increased, and consequently more "sweaty" therefore needing more food intake. Of course now tuey can only get less food than before the mines opened because nothing can now grow on that land and there is no fish in the rivers, not even bacteria survives. - The plants and trees which absorb CO² and in return supply some of the Oxygen element of the air we need to breathe, and live, have suffered - without even starting on the vast ecological impact on wildlife, bugs, beetles, birds etc etc.
The river water, bed and banks have changed colour, and the water is no longer consumable, whereas it always was before, it also contained fish - so now they even have less to no water, to add to less to no food.
Teams of Scientists have been allowed to now conduct analyses on the river itself and the surrounding farmlands to assess what the problem is.
They have conducted massive ecological surveys and have found that the river contains no life form whatsoever, not even bacteria, and obviously this water, which is now sulphuric acid; an acid powerful enough to dissolve fully hardened concrete, that once fed the farmland as nourishing water, has penetrated the surrounding land and killed that once fertile farmland.
All this has happened since the mine opened - and yet, oddly enough, not one of those pittance paid, starved, waiting to die from having their lungs, in fact their entire bodies, burnt out poor workers have a mobile phone? themselves, because they can't afford one!
Personally, I don't see anything "ECO friendly" about any of that.
We are all bombarded with "man made climate change" and "net zero" - yet our atmosphere contains just 0.04% of CO² - if that drops to 0.02% of CO², all vegetation on earth will die, and once all vegetation dies, all life forms on earth will die also as there'll be no oxygen and no food.
I'll finish here in recognition of two great names:
1. Socrates (500 BC) .... My headline - I hope I've made you think
2. Sir Isaac Newton, and his third law of motion: "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction" is easily transferable, it just needs thinking about.
But of course, all this forms part of another theory I have, regarding the earth being a natural generator, and THE PYRAMIDS not being what we've been told